Cross-tabulation Analysis of the Impact of University Students on IEQ Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi31202535Keywords:
Thermal comfort, Indoor environmental quality, University studentsAbstract
This study investigates the impact of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors—thermal environment, indoor air quality, lighting, and acoustics—on university students' satisfaction. Conducted at University College London (UCL), the research employs a mixed-method approach, combining subjective assessments through questionnaires with objective measurements of environmental conditions. The findings reveal that students exhibit higher satisfaction with cooler indoor environments during spring, with thermal comfort significantly influencing their overall satisfaction. Indoor air quality, particularly air movement and relative humidity, also plays a crucial role, with students preferring neutral conditions. Acoustic and lighting environments further impact satisfaction, with a notable preference for brighter lighting despite overall contentment with current levels. The study underscores the complex interplay between various IEQ factors and their collective influence on students' well-being, highlighting the need for tailored environmental designs in educational settings to enhance student satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Jiang, J., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Di, Y., & Liu, J. (2021). A holistic approach to the evaluation of the indoor temperature based on thermal comfort and learning performance. Building and Environment, 196, 107803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107803
Latip, A., Latip, A., Masliana Tamrin, & Rahim, F. A. (2024). Modelling physical ergonomics and student performance in higher education: the mediating effect of student motivation. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-01-2024-0052
Lyu, J., Pitt, M., & Broyd, T. (2024). The impact of IEQ in the university lecture theatres on students’ concentration levels in London. Facilities, 42(9/10), 748–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-04-2023-0036
Djongyang, N., Tchinda, R., & Njomo, D. (2010). Thermal comfort: A review paper. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 2626–2640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.040
Liang, H.-H., Lin, T.-P., & Hwang, R.-L. (2012). Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings. Applied Energy, 94, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.004
Wong, L. T., Mui, K. W., & Tsang, T. W. (2018). An open acceptance model for indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Building and Environment, 142, 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.031
Yun, H., Nam, I., Kim, J., Yang, J., Lee, K., & Sohn, J. (2014). A field study of thermal comfort for kindergarten children in Korea: An assessment of existing models and preferences of children. Building and Environment, 75, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.02.003
Al-Rashidi, K., Loveday, D., & Al-Mutawa, N. (2012). Impact of ventilation modes on carbon dioxide concentration levels in Kuwait classrooms. Energy and Buildings, 47, 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.030
Fong, M. L., Hanby, V., Greenough, R., Lin, Z., & Cheng, Y. (2015). Acceptance of thermal conditions and energy use of three ventilation strategies with six exhaust configurations for the classroom. Building and Environment, 94, 606–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.10.024
Almeida, R. M. S. F., & de Freitas, V. P. (2015). IEQ Assessment of Classrooms with an Optimized Demand Controlled Ventilation System. Energy Procedia, 78, 3132–3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.769
Kim, K., & Kwon, K. (2024). Tangible computing tools in AI education: Approach to improve elementary students’ knowledge, perception, and behavioral intention towards AI. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12497-2
Benka-Coker, W., Young, B., Oliver, S., Schaeffer, J. W., Manning, D., Suter, J., … Magzamen, S. (2021). Sociodemographic variations in the association between indoor environmental quality in school buildings and student performance. Building and Environment, 206, 108390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108390
Nastaran Makaremi, Yildirim, S., Morgan, G. T., Touchie, M. F., Jakubiec, A., & Robinson, J. (2024). Impact of classroom environment on student wellbeing in higher education: Review and future directions. Building and Environment, 111958–111958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111958
Kim, Y., Kim, M. S., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 17(2), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.313
Brink, H. W., Krijnen, W. P., Loomans, M. G. L. C., Mobach, M. P., & Kort, H. S. M. (2022). Positive Effects of Indoor Environmental Conditions on Students and Their Performance in Higher Education Classrooms: A Between-Groups Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4248761
Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2018). Thermal comfort expectations and adaptive behavioural characteristics of primary and secondary school students. Building and Environment, 127, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.031
Piderit Moreno, M., & Labarca, C. (2015). Methodology for Assessing Daylighting Design Strategies in Classroom with a Climate-Based Method. Sustainability, 7(1), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010880
Barkmann, C., Wessolowski, N., & Schulte-Markwort, M. (2012). Applicability and efficacy of variable light in schools. Physiology & Behavior, 105(3), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.020
Nsapu, I. M. K., E-Andjafono, D. O. L., Nzanza, R. M., Tshipukane, D. N., Makopa, I. K., Gedikondele, J. S., & Thamba, C. M. (2022). Effects of Environmental Noise on School Performance among Hearing-Impaired Students. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 11(5), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijohns.2022.115026
Gaihre, S., Semple, S., Miller, J., Fielding, S., & Turner, S. (2014). Classroom Carbon Dioxide Concentration, School Attendance, and Educational Attainment. Journal of School Health, 84(9), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12183
Fransson, N., Västfjäll, D., & Skoog, J. (2007). In search of the comfortable indoor environment: A comparison of the utility of objective and subjective indicators of indoor comfort. Building and Environment, 42(5), 1886–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.021
Feige, A., Wallbaum, H., Janser, M., & Windlinger, L. (2013). Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupant’s comfort and productivity. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-01-2013-0004
Al horr, Y., Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., & Elsarrag, E. (2016). Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006
Clausen, G., & Wyon, D. (2008). The Combined Effects of Many Different Indoor Environmental Factors on Acceptability and Office Work Performance. HVAC&R Research, 14(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2008.10390996
Alkaabi, K., Mehmood, K., Hdhaiba, S. B., Aljaberi, S., & Alkaabi, N. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Thermal Environment on Student Well-Being in Sustainable Campus Settings. Applied Sciences, 14(24), 11832. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411832
Yao, R., Liu, J., & Li, B. (2010). Occupants’ adaptive responses and perception of thermal environment in naturally conditioned university classrooms. Applied Energy, 87(3), 1015–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.028
Buratti, C., & Ricciardi, P. (2009). Adaptive analysis of thermal comfort in university classrooms: Correlation between experimental data and mathematical models. Building and Environment, 44(4), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.001
Lyu, J., & Pitt, M. (2025). Thermal comfort and adaptive behaviour of the elderly: a systematic review. Knowledge and Decision Systems with Applications, 1, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.59543/kadsa.v1i.13609
Pradhan, S., Jang, Y., & Chauhan, H. (2024). Investigating effects of indoor temperature and lighting on university students’ learning performance considering sensation, comfort, and physiological responses. Building and Environment, 111346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111346
Wilkins, S., Hazzam, J., & Ireland, J. J. (2022). Servicescape in transnational higher education: the effects of campus design, physical environment and facilities on student experience and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2139792
Bhandari, N., Tadepalli, S., & Gopalakrishnan, P. (2024). Investigation of acoustic comfort, productivity, and engagement in naturally ventilated university classrooms: Role of background noise and students’ noise sensitivity. Building and Environment, 249, 111131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111131
Zhang, J., Liu, C., Luther, M., Chil, B., Zhao, J., & Liu, C. (2023). Students’ sound environment perceptions in informal learning spaces: a case study on a university campus in Australia. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-02-2023-0118
Sharma, V., Mathur, J., & Mathur, S. (2024). Impact of indoor thermal environment on human thermal comfort, psychological response, and performance during winter in Jaipur, India. Building and Environment, 261, 111706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111706
Zhao, H., Ji, W., Deng, S., Wang, Z., & Liu, S. (2024). A review of dynamic thermal comfort influenced by environmental parameters and human factors. Energy and Buildings, 114467–114467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114467
Chen, H., Ding, X., Li, R., Gong, S., Liu, B., Li, Q., & Gao, W. (2024). An experimental case study of natural ventilation effects on the residential thermal environment and predicted thermal comfort in Kunming. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 56, 104198–104198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.104198
Iasmin Lourenço Niza, Costa, G., & Evandro Eduardo Broday. (2024). Indoor environmental quality models: A bibliometric, mapping and clustering review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 203, 114791–114791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114791
Zeng, F., Liang, S., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Feng, S., Mo, Q., … Wang, S. (2024). The effects of acoustic-light-thermal environment quality parameters on pedestrians’ overall comforts in residential districts. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70227-7
Pradhan, S., Jang, Y., & Chauhan, H. (2024). Investigating effects of indoor temperature and lighting on university students’ learning performance considering sensation, comfort, and physiological responses. Building and Environment, 111346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111346
Su, Y., Wang, C., Li, Z., Meng, Q., Gong, A., Wu, Z., & Zhao, Q. (2024). Summer outdoor thermal comfort assessment in city squares—A case study of cold dry winter, hot summer climate zone. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105062
Damiati, S. A., Zaki, S. A., Rijal, H. B., & Wonorahardjo, S. (2016). Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Japan during hot and humid season. Building and Environment, 109, 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.024
Rijal, H. B., Yoshida, H., & Umemiya, N. (2010). Seasonal and regional differences in neutral temperatures in Nepalese traditional vernacular houses. Building and Environment, 45(12), 2743–2753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Junpeng Lyu, Michael Pitt (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.