The Effects of Public Transit in Vehicle Safety Measures for Women on Gender Equity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi31202540Keywords:
Public Transit, In-vehicle Security, Autonomous Vehicles, Gender EquityAbstract
Security-related risk perception significantly influences passengers' travel decisions, yet current security infrastructure in public transportation fails to equally address the safety needs of men and women. Research indicates that women experience criminal and violent acts more frequently in public transit despite existing security measures, leading to behavioral adaptations such as trip avoidance, mode shifts, or destination changes. These adjustments create barriers to accessing jobs, education, healthcare, and social services, ultimately undermining transportation equity. This study examines the relationship between in-vehicle security applications and gender equity through a literature review of global and Turkish implementations, assessing their effectiveness in promoting equitable transit access. Additionally, the potential future impacts of autonomous vehicles on in-vehicle security are explored. The paper concludes with policy recommendations to enhance security infrastructure while advancing gender equity in public transportation.
Downloads
References
Masoumi, H. E., & Fastenmeier, W. (2016). Perceptions of security in public transport systems of Germany: Prospects for future research. Journal of Transportation Security, 9(1–2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-016-0169-y
Beecroft, M., & Pangbourne, K. (2015). Future prospects for personal security in travel by public transport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 38(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2014.976980
Duchène, C. (2011). Gender and transport. International Transport Forum. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/dp201111.pdf
Allen, H., & Vanderschuren, M. (2016). Safe and sound: International research on women’s personal safety on public transport. FIA Foundation. https://www.fiafoundation.org/media/20if5xh4/safe-and-sound-report.pdf
Dunckel-Graglia, A. (2013). Women-only transportation: How ‘pink’ public transportation changes public perception of women’s mobility. Journal of Public Transportation, 16(2), 5. http://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.2.5
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2014). Fear and safety in transit environments from the women’s perspective. Security Journal, 27(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.9
Stark, J., & Meschik, M. (2018). Women’s everyday mobility: Frightening situations and their impacts on travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.017
Mitra-Sarkar, S., & Partheeban, P. (2011). Abandon all hope, ye who enter here: Understanding the problem of ‘Eve Teasing’ in Chennai, India. Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.17226/22887
Jain, T., & Parida, P. (2014). Gender appraisal of mobility patterns and instances of exclusion for working population in Delhi. In Bridging the Gap: 5th International Conference. https://wiit-paris2014.sciencesconf.org/conference/wiit-paris2014/pages/Proceedings_The_5th_International_Conference_on_WIiT_1.pdf
Easton, H., & Smith, F. (2003). Getting there: Reducing crime on public transport. Scottish Executive. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b07c4148d550f1279dcb9d65579898b8eaa9569b
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2008). How safe is the ride? Evaluation of design and policy responses to women’s fear of victimization and crime. UC Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zg5x2sb
Kash, G. (2014). Gendered perspectives on transit crime in Arequipa, Perú, and Bogotá, Colombia. Transportation Research Board. https://trid.trb.org/View/1287992
Gekoski, A., Gray, J. M., Horvath, M. A. H., Edwards, S., Emirali, A., & Adler, J. R. (2015). What works in reducing sexual harassment and sexual offences on public transport nationally and internationally: A rapid evidence assessment. UK Government. https://safeguardingsupporthub.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/Gekoski%2C%20Gray%2C%20Horvath%2C%20Edwards%2C%20Emirali%20%26%20Adler%202015.pdf
Litman, T. (2025). Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://www.vtpi.org/equity.pdf
Kaplan, S., Gordon, B., El Zarwi, F., Walker, J. L., & Zilberman, D. (2019). The future of autonomous vehicles: Lessons from the literature on technology adoption. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 41(4), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppz005
Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2016). How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.022
Gordon, M. T., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear. Free Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Female_Fear.html?hl=tr&id=MGCapzswEv8C
Reark Research. (1995). NSW Police Service community attitude survey: Executive summary interim report (February–July 1995). NSW Police.
Dirección General Adjunta de Estudios. (2010). La discriminación y violencia contra las mujeres en el transporte público de la Ciudad de México. Gobierno de la Ciudad de México.
Valentine, G. (1989). Images of danger: Women’s sources of information about the spatial distribution of male violence. Area, 21(4), 385–390. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20003048
Wade, L. (2009). The relativity of feminist liberation. Sociological Images. https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/08/the-relativity-of-feminist-liberation/
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Intimidated riders: US women’s perspectives about safety in transit settings. In Safety and security in transit environments (pp. 291–308). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137457653_16
Smith, M. J. (2008). Addressing the security needs of women passengers on public transport. Security Journal, 21(2), 117–133. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/addressing-security-needs-women-passengers-public-transport
UN Women Asia and the Pacific. (2012). Making Port Moresby safer for women and girls: A scoping study. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2012/9/making-port-moresby-safer-for-women-and-girls
Note: No DOI; linked to UN Women.
Kash, G. (2014). Crime in informal and formal public transit systems: A comparison of user perceptions in El Alto, Bolivia and Bogotá and Soacha, Colombia. http://www.triointerativa.com.br/hermes/wpsc_insc/upload/d_9242775808088.doc
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Fink, C. (2009). Addressing women’s fear of victimization in transportation settings. Urban Affairs Review, 44(4), 554–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408322874
Beyazit, E. (2011). Evaluating social justice in transport: Lessons to be learned from the capability approach. Transport Reviews, 31(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.504900
Kramer, A., & Goldstein, A. (2015). Meeting the public’s need for transit options: Characteristics of socially equitable transit networks. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1714094266
Lubitow, A., Rainer, J., & Bassett, S. (2017). Exclusion and vulnerability on public transit: Experiences of transit-dependent riders in Portland, Oregon. Mobilities, 12(6), 924–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1253816
Lee, R. J., Sener, I. N., & Jones, S. N. (2017). Understanding the role of equity in active transportation planning in the United States. Transport Reviews, 37(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1239660
Lecompte, M. C., & Pablo, B. S. J. (2017). Transport systems and their impact on gender equity. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4245–4257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.230
Norman, K. (2013). Social dimensions of transport: A resource for social impact appraisals. DFID. https://www.research4cap.org/wp-content/uploads/ral/Norman-DFID-Africa-2013-Social+Dimensions+Transport-DFID-v130805.pdf
Pakusch, C., & Bossauer, P. (2017). User acceptance of fully autonomous public transport. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006472900520060
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. (2005). Guidelines for gender mainstreaming. SIDA.
Allen, H. (2016). Safe and secure, from London to Lahore and everywhere in between! LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/safe-secure-from-london-lahore-everywhere-between-heather-allen/
Tillous, M., & Gillot, G. (2014). Women-only cars in the Cairo metro: A response to what problem? Mouvements, 78(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.34894/VQ1DJA
Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2001). Where is computing driving cars? *International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13*(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1302_7
Özgüner, Ü., Stiller, C., & Redmill, K. (2007). Systems for safety and autonomous behavior in cars: The DARPA grand challenge experience. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2006.888394
EY. (2013). Autonomes Fahren – die Zukunft des Pkw-Marktes? EYGM Limited.
Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. University of Michigan. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/108384/103024.pdf
Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
Hulse, L. M., Xie, H., & Galea, E. R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
Bagloee, S. A., Tavana, M., Asadi, M., & Oliver, T. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. Journal of Modern Transportation, 24(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3
König, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 44, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
De La Torre, G., Rad, P., & Choo, K. K. R. (2020). Driverless vehicle security: Challenges and future research opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 108, 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.12.041
Salonen, A. O. (2018). Passenger’s subjective traffic safety, in-vehicle security and emergency management in the driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Transport Policy, 61, 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.10.011
Bissell, D. (2010). Passenger mobilities: Affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909
Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., Caldwell, D., & DeLuca, L. (1992). Tolerance for sexual harassment related to self-reported sexual victimization. Gender & Society, 6(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124392006001008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ilgin Yasar, Gulin Goksu Basaran (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.