Extension of Interaction Geometric Aggregation Operator for Material Selection Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hypersoft Set

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202410

Keywords:

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set, IVIFHSIWG operator, MCGDM, Material selection

Abstract

A recently emerged area of research named intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set (IFHSS) attempts to describe the internal limitations of intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets on multiparameter functions. A computation of such a type connects a power set of the universe with a tuple of sub-parameters. The strategy shows the allocation of attributes to their respective sub-attribute values in distinct groupings. The above features make it a unique methodical tool for handling obstacles of hesitation. The aggregation operators have an important role in the assessment of both types of potential and in identifying problems from their assessment. This research extends the use of the interaction aggregation operator to the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set (IVIFHSS), which is an entirely new structure generated through the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft set (IVIFSS). The IVIFHSS significantly condenses information that is inaccurate and imprecise compared to the frequently utilized IFSS and IVIFSS. Fuzzy reasoning is recognized as the prevalent strategy for improving imperfect data in decision-making processes. The core objective of the research is to develop operational rules for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft numbers (IVIFHSNs), which promote interactions. This research is designed to broaden the utilization of the interaction geometric aggregation operator in the framework of IVIFHSS. In particular, we propose a novel operator known as the Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hypersoft Interactive Weighted Geometric (IVIFHSIWG) operator. The aggregation operator indicates industry professional support for the implementation of a robust MCGDM material selection technique in order to address this need.  The practical application of the intended MCGDM technique has been introduced in selecting materials (MS) for cryogenic storage containers. The influence advocates that the anticipated model is more operational and stable in demonstrating anxious facts based on IVIFHSS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Saalam Ali, Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Sialkot Campus, Pakistan

    .

  • Hamza Naveed, Department of Computer Science & Information Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

    .

  • Imran Siddique, Department of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan

    .

  • Rana Muhammad Zulqarnain, School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321004, China

    .

References

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Turksen, I. B. (1986). Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy sets and systems, 20(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(86)90077-1

Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_1

Wang, W., & Liu, X. (2011). Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations. International journal of intelligent systems, 26(11), 1049-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20498

Garg, H., & Rani, D. (2022). An efficient intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach based on novel aggregation operators for the assessment of solid waste management techniques. Applied Intelligence, 52(4), 4330-4363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02541-w

Ejegwa, P. A., & Agbetayo, J. M. (2023). Similarity-distance decision-making technique and its applications via intuitionistic fuzzy pairs. Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, 2(1), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCCE512522514

Atanassov, K. T., & Atanassov, K. T. (1999). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Theory and applications, 139-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_2

Gurmani, S. H., Chen, H., & Bai, Y. (2023). Multi-attribute group decision-making model for selecting the most suitable construction company using the linguistic interval-valued T-spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Applied Intelligence, 53(10), 11768-11785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04103-0

Xu, Z., & Gou, X. (2017). An overview of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregations and applications. Granular Computing, 2, 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-016-0023-4

Xu, Z. (2007). Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control and decision, 22(2), 215-219. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:124108087

Zhang, Z. (2018). Geometric Bonferroni means of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 29, 1139-1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2621-0

Park, D. G., Kwun, Y. C., Park, J. H., & Park, I. Y. (2009). Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems. Mathematical and computer modelling, 50(9-10), 1279-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.06.010

Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M. K., Grover, N., & Pedrycz, W. (2018). Multi-attribute group decision making based on extended TOPSIS method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 69, 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.032

Garg, H., & Kumar, K. (2019). Linguistic interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision making problems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(12), 2302-2311. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2897961

Molodtsov, D. (1999). Soft set theory—first results. Computers & mathematics with applications, 37(4-5), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5

Maji, P. K., Biswas, R., & Roy, A. R. (2003). Soft set theory. Computers & mathematics with applications, 45(4-5), 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)00016-6

Maji, P. K., Biswas, R., & Roy, A. R. (2001). Fuzzy soft sets, Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 9, 589–602.

Maji, P. K., Biswas, R., & Roy, A. R. (2001). Intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets, Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 9, 677–692.

Arora, R., & Garg, H. (2018). A robust aggregation operators for multi-criteria decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy soft set environment. Scientia Iranica, 25(2), 931-942. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4433

Jiang, Y., Tang, Y., Chen, Q., Liu, H., & Tang, J. (2010). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and their properties. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 60(3), 906-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.05.036

Zulqarnain, R. M., Xin, X. L., Saqlain, M., & Khan, W. A. (2021). TOPSIS method based on the correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and aggregation operators with their application in decision-making. Journal of Mathematics, 2021, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6656858

Zulqarnain, M., Saeed, M., & Tabassum, M. F. (2016). Comparison between fuzzy soft matrix (FSM) and interval valued fuzzy soft matrix (IVFSM) in decision making. Science International (Lahore), 28(5), 4277-4283.

Ma, X., Qin, H., & Abawajy, J. H. (2020). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision-making and parameter reduction. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(2), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3039335

Smarandache, F. (2018). Extension of soft set to hypersoft set, and then to plithogenic hypersoft set. Neutrosophic sets and systems, 22(1), 168-170.

Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., Khalifa, H. A. E. W., & Afifi, W. A. (2022). Decision making algorithmic techniques based on aggregation operations and similarity measures of possibility intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft sets. AIMS Math, 7(3), 3866-3895. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022214

Zulqarnain, R. M., Siddique, I., Ali, R., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., & Bozanic, D. (2021). Robust aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set with their application to solve MCDM problem. Entropy, 23(6), 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060688

Debnath, S. (2022). Interval-valued intuitionistic hypersoft sets and their algorithmic approach in multi-criteria decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst, 48, 226-250.

Zulqarnain, R. M., Siddique, I., Jarad, F., & Iampan, A. (2022). Aggregation operators for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set with their application in material selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8321964

Stocker, T. (2014). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324

CaraDonna, P. J., Cunningham, J. L., & Iler, A. M. (2018). Experimental warming in the field delays phenology and reduces body mass, fat content and survival: Implications for the persistence of a pollinator under climate change. Functional Ecology, 32(10), 2345-2356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13151

Kontgis, C., Schneider, A., Ozdogan, M., Kucharik, C., Duc, N. H., & Schatz, J. (2019). Climate change impacts on rice productivity in the Mekong River Delta. Applied Geography, 102, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.12.004

Mazdiyasni, O., & AghaKouchak, A. (2015). Substantial increase in concurrent droughts and heatwaves in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(37), 11484-11489. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422945112

Warner, K., Ehrhart, C., Sherbinin, A. D., Adamo, S., & Chai-Onn, T. (2009). In search of shelter: Mapping the effects of climate change on human migration and displacement. In search of shelter: mapping the effects of climate change on human migration and displacement.

United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. (1994). Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation.

Dudley, B. (2018). BP statistical review of world energy 2018. Energy economic, Centre for energy economics research and policy. British Petroleum, Available via https://www. bp. com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/electricity. html, 5.

Saito, S. (2010). Role of nuclear energy to a future society of shortage of energy resources and global warming. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 398(1-3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.002

Farag, M. M. (2020). Materials and process selection for engineering design. CRC press.

Flynn, T. M. (2005). Cryogenic engineering, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2005.

Wei, G. (2010). Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Applied soft computing, 10(2), 423-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.009

Wang, W., & Liu, X. (2011). Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations. International journal of intelligent systems, 26(11), 1049-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20498

Downloads

Published

2024-01-09

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Operations Intelligence

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Operations Intelligence

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ali, S. ., Naveed, H. ., Siddique, I. ., & Zulqarnain, R. M. . (2024). Extension of Interaction Geometric Aggregation Operator for Material Selection Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hypersoft Set. Journal of Operations Intelligence, 2(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202410